Last edited by Brat
Thursday, April 23, 2020 | History

2 edition of Application for review of judgment no. 273 of the United Nations Administrative Tribunal found in the catalog.

Application for review of judgment no. 273 of the United Nations Administrative Tribunal

International Court of Justice.

Application for review of judgment no. 273 of the United Nations Administrative Tribunal

advisory opinion = Demande de reformation du jugement n ̊273 du Tribunal administratif des Nations unies : avis consultatif.

by International Court of Justice.

  • 62 Want to read
  • 4 Currently reading

Published by International Court of Justice in [The Hague, Netherlands .
Written in English

    Subjects:
  • Mortished, Ivor Peter -- Trials, litigation, etc.,
  • United Nations. -- Secretary-General -- Trials, litigation, etc.,
  • United Nations -- Officials and employees. -- Salaries, etc.,
  • United Nations. -- Administrative Tribunal

  • Edition Notes

    Other titlesDemande de reformation du jugement n ̊273 du Tribunal administratif des Nations unies
    The Physical Object
    Pagination1 v. (various pagings) ;
    ID Numbers
    Open LibraryOL16608782M

    the United Nations and the specialized agencies that have accepted the statute of the United Nations Administrative Tribunal (UNAT).4 This article will start by providing an overview of the deficiencies of the current internal justice system of the United Nations and will then analyze the recommendations for reform and their chances for success. United States of America) / International Court of Justice = Affaire de l'incident aerien du 3 juillet (Republique Islamique d'Iran c. Etats-Unis d'Amerique) / Cour Internationale de Justice The Court [The Hague] Application for review of judgement no. of the United Nations Administrative Tribunal = Demande de réformation du jugement no. du Tribunal administratif des Nations unies [] International Court of Justice. Stephen Myron Schwebel (born Ma ), is an American jurist, counsel and independent serves as Judge of the World Bank Administrative Tribunal and as a member of the U.S. national group at the Permanent Court of Arbitration. Previously, he served as President of the World Bank Administrative Tribunal ( - ), as President of the International Born: Ma (age 90), New York, New .


Share this book
You might also like
Rattan

Rattan

market for institutional innovation in the Common Agricultural Policy of the European Community

market for institutional innovation in the Common Agricultural Policy of the European Community

Development of oil and gas mining leases on Indian reservations.

Development of oil and gas mining leases on Indian reservations.

Palladian bridges

Palladian bridges

The genome revolution

The genome revolution

structure and development of Israels balance of payments

structure and development of Israels balance of payments

Merrill Earth Science - Science Intergration Activities

Merrill Earth Science - Science Intergration Activities

Personnel management

Personnel management

Miss Lonelyhearts & The day of the locust

Miss Lonelyhearts & The day of the locust

The children of Clearwater Bay

The children of Clearwater Bay

Mobilising human resources for innovation

Mobilising human resources for innovation

Wealth tax, the industry view

Wealth tax, the industry view

Imports under items 806.30 and 807.00 of the Tariff schedules of the United States, 1980-83

Imports under items 806.30 and 807.00 of the Tariff schedules of the United States, 1980-83

Assuring quality for agencies approved for practice learning

Assuring quality for agencies approved for practice learning

Application for review of judgment no. 273 of the United Nations Administrative Tribunal by International Court of Justice. Download PDF EPUB FB2

The Judgement of the United Nations Administrative Tribunal (Judgement No. ) which was the subject of the application to the Committee on Applications for Review of Administrative Tribunal Judgements resulting in the present request for advisory opinion was given on 15 May in case No.

Mortished v. the Secretary-General of the United Nations. "The Committee on Applications for Review of Administrative Tribunal Judgements has decided that there is a substantial basis within the meaning of Article 11 of the Statute of the Administrative Tribunal for the application presented by the United States of America for review of Administrative Tribunal Judgement No.delivered at Geneva on.

Application for Review of Judgment No. of the United Nations Administrative Tribunal - The Court gives its Advisory 0pinion on an Application for Review of Judgement No.

of the United Nations Administrative Tribunal Available in: English French. Application for Review of Judgment No. of the United Nations Administrative Tribunal. Application for review of judgement no. of the United Nations Administrative Tribunal / International Court of Justice = Demande de reformation du jugement no.

du Tribunal administratif des Nations Unies / Cour internationale de justice I.C.J. ; Sales Section, United Nations [distributor [Hague, Netherlands]: New York, NY, USA.

Press release /13 20 July Application for Review of Judgment No. of the United Nations Administrative Tribunal - The Court gives its Advisory 0pinion on an Application for Review of Judgement No.

of the United Nations Administrative Tribunal. THE UNITED NATIONS APPEALS TRIBUNAL Judgment No. UNAT 2 of 6 JUDGE LUIS MARÍA SIMÓN, Presiding. application for review of judgement no. of the united nations administrative tribunal advisory opinion of 20 july case concerning the continental shelf (libyan arab jamahiriya/malta) (application for permission to intervene) judgment of 21 march case concerning military and paramilitary activities inFile Size: 9MB.

United Nations Administrative Tribunal. As a result of the decision of the General Assembly to establish a new system of administration of justice, including a two-tier formal system comprising a first instance, the UN Dispute Tribunal, and an appellate instance, the UN Appeals Tribunal, the UN Administrative Tribunal was abolished as of 31 December (See resolutions.

United Nations Administrative Tribunal. Judgements. English | Français. Overview | FAQ | Contact Us | UNAT Home | Links | U.N. Home Page | Search. Statute | Rules.

requested in July on an Application for Review of Judgement No. of the United Nations Admin-istrative Tribunal, concerning the payment of a repatriation grant to a United Nations staff member on separation from service (p. Two Judges were re-elected and three new ones elected to the Court for terms beginning in February (p.

United Nations, the President of the Tribunal, with the agreement of the Respondent, extended the time-limit for the filing of an application to the Tribunal to 30 June ; Whereas, on 25 June and 5 Novemberthe Applicant filed an application that did not fulfil all the formal requirements of article 7 of the Rules of the Tribunal.

Get this from a library. Application for review of judgement no. of the United Nations Administrative Tribunal. [Ivor Peter Mortished; United Nations. Administrative Tribunal.; International Court of Justice.; United Nations.

Secretary-General.;]. translation missing: ry_opinions | Application for Review of Judgment No. of the United Nations Administrative Tribunal. translation missing: t_advisory_opinion | Application for Review of Judgment No. of the United Nations Administrative Tribunal.

Application for Review of Judgment No. of the United Nations Administrative Tribunal. Application for Review of Judgment No. of the United Nations Administrative Tribunal. Judgment No of the Administrative Tribunal of the International Labour Organization upon a Complaint Filed against the International Fund for.

United Nations, the President of the Tribunal, with the agreement of the Respondent, extended to 28 February the time limit for the filing of an application with the Tribunal; Whereas, on 11 Februarythe Applicant filed an Application containing pleas which read, in part, as follows: “II: PLEAS File Size: 64KB.

"Application for Review of Judgment No of the United Nations Administrative Tribunal, Advisory Opinion, [] ICJ ICGJ (ICJ ), 27th MayUnited Nations [UN]; International Court of Justice [ICJ]" published on by Oxford University Press. Application for Review of Judgment No.

of the United Nations Administrative Tribunal, Advisory Opinion, I.C.J. Reportsp. Continental Shelf (Libyan Arab Jamarhiriya/Malta), Application by Italy for Permission to Intervene, Judgment, I.C.J.

Reportsp. The Tribunal shall decide in each case whether the oral proceedings before it or any part of them shall be public or in camera. Article VI 1. The Tribunal shall take decisions by a majority vote. Judgments shall be final and without appeal. The Tribunal may nevertheless consider applications for interpretation, execution or review of a judgment.

Counsel and Advocate for France in the case concerning Application for Review of Judgment No. of the United Nations Administrative Tribunal () Enregistrer ICJ. United Nations Administrative Tribunal. Frequently Asked Questions. t he Secretary-General and the Applicant agree to submit an application directly to the Tribunal, without the matter having gone through the joint body procedure outlined above.

This is known as direct submission, and is only possible when there is no dispute as to the. "The Committee on Applications for Review of Administrative Tribunal Judgements has decided that there is a substantial basis within the meaning of Article 11 of the Statute of the Administrative Tribunal for the application for the review of Administrative Tribunal Judgement No.

delivered at Geneva on 28 April Application for Review of Judgement No. of the United Nations Administrative Tribunal: United Nations Administrative Tribunal: 28 July 20 July Opinion on Merits Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary in the Gulf of Maine Area Canada United States: 25 November 12 October Judgment on Merits Judgment No.

UNDT//, rendered by the United Nations Dispute Tribunal (UNDT or Dispute Tribunal) in New York on 22 Junein the case of Kisia v. Secretary-General of the United Nations. Judgment No. UNAT 2 of 10 JUDGE ROSALYN CHAPMAN, PRESIDING.

On 19 Februarythe Dispute Tribunal of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA DT or UNRWA Dispute Tribunal and UNRWA or Agency, respectively) issued Judgment No. UNRWA/DT//, in the case of Chahrour v. consequences. (Judgment No.

Andronov (), quoted in Judgment No. Wyss ()). In light of the foregoing, the Tribunal is of the opinion that an administrative decision can only be considered as such if inter alia it has direct legal consequences on a staff member’s rights and obligations.

Get this from a library. Application for review of judgement no. of the United Nations Administrative Tribunal. [International Court of Justice.; United Nations. Administrative Tribunal.; United Nations. Secretary-General.;] -- "The present volume reproduces the Request for opinion, the dossier transmitted by the Secretary-General of the United Nations, the.

Judgment of the Administrative Tribunal handed down on 15 October JUDGMENT IN CASE No. 42 Mr. v/ Secretary-General Translation (The French version constitutes the authentic text) 2 JUDGMENT IN CASE No. 42 OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL Sitting on Friday 8 October at 11 a.m. in the Château de la Muette.

On 12 Julythe United Nations Dispute Tribunal (UNDT or Dispute Tribunal) in Nairobi issued Judgment No. UNDT// in the case of. UN Administrative Tribunal () The United Nations Administrative Tribunal was established by General Assembly resolution A (IV) of 24 November ; the annexed Statute defined the mandate of the Tribunal.

The Statute was amended by the General Assembly at various times; the final text is contained in AT/11/Rev.6 (Sales number: X.1). The Solange case-law stands for a specific form of interaction between the legal order of the European Union (EU) and the legal orders of the member states (MS) or, respectively, between the European Court of Justice (ECJ) and the national Constitutional Courts of the MS.

At the start of this line of cases the German Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht—BverfG) first Author: Peter Hilpold. Case No. UNDT/GVA// Judgment No. UNDT// Page 2 of 8 Introduction 1.

On 19 Januarythe Applicant, a staff member with the United Nations. Advisory Opinion of J International Court of Justice, case 'Application for Review of Judgment No.

of the United Nations Administrative Tribunal'. Application for Review of Judgment No. of the United Nations Administrative Tribunal Competence of the Court Advisory Opinion of 12 July First time It is the first time it considered a request for an advisory opinion made under Article 11 Request: Organ of the UN A.

The NATO Administrative Tribunal (Tribunal) has been seized of an appeal registered on 1 Septemberby Mr PK, against the NATO Support Agency (NSPA), which was registered on 2 September as Case No. / The appellant seeks annulment of the respondent’s decision dated 5 May informing.

(Application for Review of Judgement No. of the United Nations Administrative Tribunal, Advisory Opinion, I.C.J.

Reportspp. para. ) It is for the Court to satisfy itself that the request for an advisory opinion comes from. Zekarias Bekele against Judgment No. UNDT// rendered by the United Nations Dispute Tribunal (UNDT or Dispute Tribunal) in Nairobi on 8. In re Reis-Ekelund (No. 2) (Application for review) Judgment No.

The Administrative Tribunal, Considering the application for review of Judgment filed by Mr Patrick Reis-Ekelund on 10 Aprilthe reply of 5 May from the International Office of Epizootics (OIE), the complainant's rejoinder of 19 September and.

This judgment is rendered by a Panel of the NATO Administrative Tribunal, composed of Mr Chris de Cooker, President, Mrs Maria-Lourdes Arastey Sahún and Mr John Crook, judges, having regard to the written procedure and further to. The United Nations Appeals Tribunal (UNAT), which replaces the former United Nations Administrative Tribunal, is an appellate court, of the two-tier formal system of administration of justice in the UN.

It was established by the UN General Assembly in December to review appeals against judgments rendered by the United Nations Dispute Tribunal (UNDT).1. The NATO Administrative Tribunal (Tribunal) was seized of an appeal against the Headquarters NATO Airborne Early Warning and Control Force Geilenkirchen (HQ NAEW&CF GK), dated 28 Octoberand registered on 11 November as Case No.

/, by Mr GV, a staff member of the HQ NAEW&CF GK. 2.review as required under Area Staff Rule (1) prior to filing an application before the Tribunal, and that the Tribunal has no jurisdiction to waive this requirement, the Tribunal holds that the applications are not receivable.